Reviewed ou2018optimal
This commit is contained in:
		@ -274,6 +274,22 @@ private and eligible for publishing.
 | 
				
			|||||||
The authors compare their design with that of~\cite{chen2012differentially} and~\cite{he2015dpt} by running several tests, and ascertain that it outperforms them in terms of data utility.
 | 
					The authors compare their design with that of~\cite{chen2012differentially} and~\cite{he2015dpt} by running several tests, and ascertain that it outperforms them in terms of data utility.
 | 
				
			||||||
However, due to DP-Star's privacy budget distribution to its different phases, for small values of $\varepsilon$ the framework's privacy performance is inferior to that of its competitors.
 | 
					However, due to DP-Star's privacy budget distribution to its different phases, for small values of $\varepsilon$ the framework's privacy performance is inferior to that of its competitors.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% An Optimal Pufferfish Privacy Mechanism for Temporally Correlated Trajectories
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - microdata
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - finite (sequential)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - batch
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - dependence (temporal)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - local
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - event
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - differential privacy
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					% - perturbation (randomized response, Laplace)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					\hypertarget{ou2018optimal}{Ou et al.}~\cite{ou2018optimal} designed \emph{FGS-Pufferfish} for publishing temporally correlated trajectory data while protecting temporal correlation.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					FGS-Pufferfish transforms a user's daily trajectories into a set of sine and cosine waves of different frequencies along with the corresponding Fourier coefficients.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Then, it adds Laplace noise to the Fourier coefficients' geometric sum. 
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					The authors obtain the optimal noisy Fourier coefficients by solving the constrained optimization problem via the Lagrange Multiplier method depending on the available privacy budget. 
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					They evaluate both the location data utility and the temporal correlation utility.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					The experimental evaluation shows that FGS-Pufferfish outperforms CTS-DP~\cite{wang2017cts} in terms of the trade-off between privacy and location utility.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\subsection{Infinite observation}
 | 
					\subsection{Infinite observation}
 | 
				
			||||||
\label{subsec:micro-infinite}
 | 
					\label{subsec:micro-infinite}
 | 
				
			||||||
@ -422,7 +438,7 @@ Last but not least, the technique requires the calculation of the temporal priva
 | 
				
			|||||||
% ON-OFF Privacy in the Presence of Correlation
 | 
					% ON-OFF Privacy in the Presence of Correlation
 | 
				
			||||||
% ON-OFF Privacy Against Correlation Over Time
 | 
					% ON-OFF Privacy Against Correlation Over Time
 | 
				
			||||||
% - microdata
 | 
					% - microdata
 | 
				
			||||||
% - infinite
 | 
					% - infinite (sequential)
 | 
				
			||||||
% - streaming
 | 
					% - streaming
 | 
				
			||||||
% - dependence
 | 
					% - dependence
 | 
				
			||||||
% - event
 | 
					% - event
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user