Reviewed ou2018optimal
This commit is contained in:
parent
d435ce1a0b
commit
f19a16df5e
@ -274,6 +274,22 @@ private and eligible for publishing.
|
|||||||
The authors compare their design with that of~\cite{chen2012differentially} and~\cite{he2015dpt} by running several tests, and ascertain that it outperforms them in terms of data utility.
|
The authors compare their design with that of~\cite{chen2012differentially} and~\cite{he2015dpt} by running several tests, and ascertain that it outperforms them in terms of data utility.
|
||||||
However, due to DP-Star's privacy budget distribution to its different phases, for small values of $\varepsilon$ the framework's privacy performance is inferior to that of its competitors.
|
However, due to DP-Star's privacy budget distribution to its different phases, for small values of $\varepsilon$ the framework's privacy performance is inferior to that of its competitors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% An Optimal Pufferfish Privacy Mechanism for Temporally Correlated Trajectories
|
||||||
|
% - microdata
|
||||||
|
% - finite (sequential)
|
||||||
|
% - batch
|
||||||
|
% - dependence (temporal)
|
||||||
|
% - local
|
||||||
|
% - event
|
||||||
|
% - differential privacy
|
||||||
|
% - perturbation (randomized response, Laplace)
|
||||||
|
\hypertarget{ou2018optimal}{Ou et al.}~\cite{ou2018optimal} designed \emph{FGS-Pufferfish} for publishing temporally correlated trajectory data while protecting temporal correlation.
|
||||||
|
FGS-Pufferfish transforms a user's daily trajectories into a set of sine and cosine waves of different frequencies along with the corresponding Fourier coefficients.
|
||||||
|
Then, it adds Laplace noise to the Fourier coefficients' geometric sum.
|
||||||
|
The authors obtain the optimal noisy Fourier coefficients by solving the constrained optimization problem via the Lagrange Multiplier method depending on the available privacy budget.
|
||||||
|
They evaluate both the location data utility and the temporal correlation utility.
|
||||||
|
The experimental evaluation shows that FGS-Pufferfish outperforms CTS-DP~\cite{wang2017cts} in terms of the trade-off between privacy and location utility.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Infinite observation}
|
\subsection{Infinite observation}
|
||||||
\label{subsec:micro-infinite}
|
\label{subsec:micro-infinite}
|
||||||
@ -422,7 +438,7 @@ Last but not least, the technique requires the calculation of the temporal priva
|
|||||||
% ON-OFF Privacy in the Presence of Correlation
|
% ON-OFF Privacy in the Presence of Correlation
|
||||||
% ON-OFF Privacy Against Correlation Over Time
|
% ON-OFF Privacy Against Correlation Over Time
|
||||||
% - microdata
|
% - microdata
|
||||||
% - infinite
|
% - infinite (sequential)
|
||||||
% - streaming
|
% - streaming
|
||||||
% - dependence
|
% - dependence
|
||||||
% - event
|
% - event
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user