diff --git a/text/conclusion/perspectives.tex b/text/conclusion/perspectives.tex index 5dd478f..a777d4c 100644 --- a/text/conclusion/perspectives.tex +++ b/text/conclusion/perspectives.tex @@ -1,33 +1,51 @@ \section{Perspectives} \label{sec:persp} -\kat{put an introductory paragraph or phrase} -\paragraph{Global {\thething} privacy} -For now, we have applied {\thething} privacy in the local scheme and for microdata due to the advantages of the local scheme over the global as we discussed in detail in Section~\ref{subsec:data-publishing}. -The adaptation of {\thething} privacy to support the global processing and publishing scheme would allow for the studying of more diverse scenarios including statistical data publishing.\kat{Hmm, i think that in the main text you say that even though the wok is for local differential privacy, nevertheless wlog you speak in terms of global differential privacy. In connection to that, this paragraph here is raising questions..} +% \kat{put an introductory paragraph or phrase} +In this section, we outline possible perspectives to this thesis regarding the different topics that we addressed. -\paragraph{{\Thething} privacy over infinite event sequences} -So far, we considered for our problem setting finite time series that are processed in batch mode. -This was a decision that we made for the shake of simplicity\kat{use another word, because this makes the current contribution sound 'simple'} in order to facilitate a more straightforward definition of {\thething} privacy. -In the future, we plan to explore more dynamic scenarios where data are processed and published in streaming mode, which will lead to adoption of time critical crowdsensing applications. \kat{no need to present all ideas as your future work. You can speak for fellow researchers, or research that can be done in general, following your current work. } - - -\paragraph{{\Thething} privacy and spatiotemporal continuity} -In mereology, the formal study on the relation between parts and the entities they form, it is generally held that the identity of an observable object depends to its \emph{spatiotemporal continuity}~\cite{wiggins1967identity, scaltsas1981identity, hazarika2001qualitative}, i.e., the property of well-behaved objects that alter their state in harmony with space and time. -Considering events that span the entirety of the user-generated series of events thereof ensures the spatiotemporal continuity of the users. -This way, it is possible to acquire more information regarding individuals' identities, and thus design privacy schemes that offer improved privacy and utility guarantees. -\kat{I did not understand how this is a perspective in connection to your work (or how this is a perspective at all)} - -\paragraph{Diversification of event categories} \kat{this is for me one of the clearest perspective so it should appear first in the list} +\paragraph{Diversification of event categories} +% \kat{this is for me one of the clearest perspective so it should appear first in the list} With the proposal of {\thething} privacy we introduced {\thething} events in privacy-preserving continuous data publishing. This categorization in regular and significant events enabled the development of a configurable differential privacy notion for time series. Variation of the existing event categories, e.g.,~weighted {\thethings}, or the introduction of new ones, would allow for an even more fine-grained configuration of privacy protection and the development of variations of {\thething} privacy. -\paragraph{More data correlation types} +\paragraph{Global {\thething} privacy} +For now, we have applied {\thething} privacy in the local scheme and for microdata due to the advantages of the local scheme over the global as we discussed in detail in Section~\ref{subsec:data-publishing}. +Since we can easily adapt {\thething} privacy to the global processing and publishing scheme, it would be interesting to observe it in more diverse scenarios (including statistical data publishing) and develop suitable methodology. +% \kat{Hmm, i think that in the main text you say that even though the wok is for local differential privacy, nevertheless wlog you speak in terms of global differential privacy. In connection to that, this paragraph here is raising questions..} +% \mk{True. I rephrased it.} + + +\paragraph{{\Thething} privacy over infinite event sequences} +So far, we considered for our problem setting finite time series that are processed in batch mode. +This was a decision that we made for +% the sake of simplicity +% \kat{use another word, because this makes the current contribution sound 'simple'} +reasons of clarity +in order to facilitate a more straightforward definition of {\thething} privacy. +In the future, +% we plan to +fellow researchers can +explore more dynamic scenarios where data are processed and published in streaming mode, which will lead to adoption of time critical crowdsensing applications. +% \kat{no need to present all ideas as your future work. You can speak for fellow researchers, or research that can be done in general, following your current work. } + + +\paragraph{{\Thething} privacy and spatiotemporal continuity} +In mereology, the formal study on the relation between parts and the entities they form, it is generally held that the identity of an observable object depends to its \emph{spatiotemporal continuity}~\cite{wiggins1967identity, scaltsas1981identity, hazarika2001qualitative}, i.e.,~the property of well-behaved objects that alter their state in harmony with space and time. +Considering events that span the entirety of the user-generated series of events thereof ensures the spatiotemporal continuity of the users. +This way, it is possible to acquire more information regarding individuals' identities, and thus design privacy schemes that offer improved privacy and utility guarantees. +% \kat{I did not understand how this is a perspective in connection to your work (or how this is a perspective at all)} +% \mk{Noted} + + +\paragraph{Consideration of other data correlation types} In the current state of our work, we consider {\thethings} as one-dimensional elements in our problem setting. Consequently, we have explored {\thething} privacy under temporal correlation and examined the behavior of temporal privacy loss for different {\thething} percentages and distributions. -Accounting for other possible dimensions, e.g.,~location, can introduce more aspects to the current use case of {\thething} privacy \kat{you mean for the correlations or in general? If it is in general, then the title should change}. +Accounting for other possible dimensions, e.g.,~location, can introduce more aspects to the current use case of {\thething} privacy +% \kat{you mean for the correlations or in general? If it is in general, then the title should change} +% \mk{OK} Indicatively, as we have extensively studied in Section~\ref{sec:correlation}, there are many types of data correlation in time series to further research in the context of {\thething} privacy.