evaluation: Figure spacing

text/evaluation/thething.tex

@@ -36,19 +36,20 @@ The lower density (average distance of $623$m) of the T-drive data set has a neg
 
 
 \begin{figure}[htp]
-	\centering
-	\subcaptionbox{Copenhagen\label{fig:copenhagen}}{%
-		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/copenhagen}%
-	}%
-	\hspace{\fill}
-	\subcaptionbox{HUE\label{fig:hue}}{%
-		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/hue}%
-	}%
-	\subcaptionbox{T-drive\label{fig:t-drive}}{%
-		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/t-drive}%
-	}%
-	\caption{The mean absolute error (a)~as a percentage, (b)~in kWh, and (c)~in meters of the released data for different {\thething} percentages.}
-	\label{fig:real}
+  \centering
+  \subcaptionbox{Copenhagen\label{fig:copenhagen}}{%
+    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/copenhagen}%
+  }%
+  \hspace{\fill}
+  \\ \bigskip
+  \subcaptionbox{HUE\label{fig:hue}}{%
+    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/hue}%
+  }%
+  \subcaptionbox{T-drive\label{fig:t-drive}}{%
+    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/t-drive}%
+  }%
+  \caption{The mean absolute error (a)~as a percentage, (b)~in kWh, and (c)~in meters of the released data for different {\thething} percentages.}
+  \label{fig:real}
 \end{figure}
 
 In general, we can claim that the Adaptive is the most reliable and best performing mechanism with minimal tuning\kat{what does minimal tuning mean?}, if we take into consideration the drawbacks of the Skip mechanism mentioned in Section~\ref{subsec:lmdk-mechs}. \kat{you can mention them also here briefly, and give the pointer for the section}
@@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ The line shows the overall privacy loss---for all cases of {\thethings} distribu
     \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-wk}%
   }%
   \hspace{\fill}
+  \\ \bigskip
   \subcaptionbox{Moderate correlation\label{fig:dist-cor-mod}}{%
     \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-mod}%
   }%