evaluation: Figure spacing
This commit is contained in:
		@ -36,19 +36,20 @@ The lower density (average distance of $623$m) of the T-drive data set has a neg
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[htp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[htp]
 | 
				
			||||||
	\centering
 | 
					  \centering
 | 
				
			||||||
	\subcaptionbox{Copenhagen\label{fig:copenhagen}}{%
 | 
					  \subcaptionbox{Copenhagen\label{fig:copenhagen}}{%
 | 
				
			||||||
		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/copenhagen}%
 | 
					    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/copenhagen}%
 | 
				
			||||||
	}%
 | 
					  }%
 | 
				
			||||||
	\hspace{\fill}
 | 
					  \hspace{\fill}
 | 
				
			||||||
	\subcaptionbox{HUE\label{fig:hue}}{%
 | 
					  \\ \bigskip
 | 
				
			||||||
		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/hue}%
 | 
					  \subcaptionbox{HUE\label{fig:hue}}{%
 | 
				
			||||||
	}%
 | 
					    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/hue}%
 | 
				
			||||||
	\subcaptionbox{T-drive\label{fig:t-drive}}{%
 | 
					  }%
 | 
				
			||||||
		\includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/t-drive}%
 | 
					  \subcaptionbox{T-drive\label{fig:t-drive}}{%
 | 
				
			||||||
	}%
 | 
					    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/t-drive}%
 | 
				
			||||||
	\caption{The mean absolute error (a)~as a percentage, (b)~in kWh, and (c)~in meters of the released data for different {\thething} percentages.}
 | 
					  }%
 | 
				
			||||||
	\label{fig:real}
 | 
					  \caption{The mean absolute error (a)~as a percentage, (b)~in kWh, and (c)~in meters of the released data for different {\thething} percentages.}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					  \label{fig:real}
 | 
				
			||||||
\end{figure}
 | 
					\end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
In general, we can claim that the Adaptive is the most reliable and best performing mechanism with minimal tuning\kat{what does minimal tuning mean?}, if we take into consideration the drawbacks of the Skip mechanism mentioned in Section~\ref{subsec:lmdk-mechs}. \kat{you can mention them also here briefly, and give the pointer for the section}
 | 
					In general, we can claim that the Adaptive is the most reliable and best performing mechanism with minimal tuning\kat{what does minimal tuning mean?}, if we take into consideration the drawbacks of the Skip mechanism mentioned in Section~\ref{subsec:lmdk-mechs}. \kat{you can mention them also here briefly, and give the pointer for the section}
 | 
				
			||||||
@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ The line shows the overall privacy loss---for all cases of {\thethings} distribu
 | 
				
			|||||||
    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-wk}%
 | 
					    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-wk}%
 | 
				
			||||||
  }%
 | 
					  }%
 | 
				
			||||||
  \hspace{\fill}
 | 
					  \hspace{\fill}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					  \\ \bigskip
 | 
				
			||||||
  \subcaptionbox{Moderate correlation\label{fig:dist-cor-mod}}{%
 | 
					  \subcaptionbox{Moderate correlation\label{fig:dist-cor-mod}}{%
 | 
				
			||||||
    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-mod}%
 | 
					    \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{evaluation/dist-cor-mod}%
 | 
				
			||||||
  }%
 | 
					  }%
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user