evaluation: Reviewed summary
This commit is contained in:
parent
4e99768ba1
commit
adf9bdaa27
@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
|||||||
\section{Summary}
|
\section{Summary}
|
||||||
\label{sec:eval-sum}
|
\label{sec:eval-sum}
|
||||||
In this chapter we presented the experimental evaluation of the {\thething} privacy schemes and the dummy {\thething} selection module that we developed in Chapter~\ref{ch:lmdk-prv}, on real and synthetic data sets.
|
In this chapter we presented the experimental evaluation of the {\thething} privacy schemes and the dummy {\thething} selection module, that we developed in Chapter~\ref{ch:lmdk-prv}, on real and synthetic data sets.
|
||||||
The \texttt{Adaptive} scheme is the most reliable and best performing scheme, in terms of overall data utility, with minimal tuning across most of the cases.
|
The \texttt{Adaptive} scheme is the most reliable and best performing scheme, in terms of overall data utility, with minimal tuning across most of the cases.
|
||||||
\texttt{Skip} performs optimally in data sets with a smaller target value range, where approximation fits best.
|
\texttt{Skip} performs optimally in data sets with a smaller target value range, where approximation fits best.
|
||||||
The dummy {\thething} selection module introduces a reasonable data utility decline to all of our schemes however, the \texttt{Adaptive} handles it well and bounds the data utility to higher levels compared to user-level protection.
|
The dummy {\thething} selection module introduces a reasonable data utility decline to all of our schemes; however, the \texttt{Adaptive} handles it well and bounds the data utility to higher levels compared to user-level protection.
|
||||||
% \kat{it would be nice to see it clearly on Figure 5.5. (eg, by including another bar that shows adaptive without landmark selection)}
|
% \kat{it would be nice to see it clearly on Figure 5.5. (eg, by including another bar that shows adaptive without landmark selection)}
|
||||||
% \mk{Done.}
|
% \mk{Done.}
|
||||||
In terms of temporal correlation, we observe that under moderate and strong temporal correlation, a greater average regular--{\thething} event distance in a {\thething} distribution causes greater temporal privacy loss.
|
In terms of temporal correlation, we observe that under moderate and strong temporal correlation, a greater average regular--{\thething} event distance in a {\thething} distribution causes greater temporal privacy loss.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user