evaluation: Moved some general info to details
This commit is contained in:
		@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ In order to get {\thethings} with the above distribution features, we generate p
 | 
				
			|||||||
For example, for a left-skewed {\thethings} distribution we would utilize a truncated distribution resulting from the restriction of the domain of a distribution to the beginning and end of the time series with its location shifted to the center of the right half of the series.
 | 
					For example, for a left-skewed {\thethings} distribution we would utilize a truncated distribution resulting from the restriction of the domain of a distribution to the beginning and end of the time series with its location shifted to the center of the right half of the series.
 | 
				
			||||||
For consistency, we calculate the scale parameter depending on the length of the series by setting it equal to the series' length over a constant.
 | 
					For consistency, we calculate the scale parameter depending on the length of the series by setting it equal to the series' length over a constant.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Notice that in our experiments, in the cases when we have $0\%$ and $100\%$ of the events being {\thethings}, we get the same behavior as in event- and user-level privacy respectively.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					This happens due the fact that at each timestamp we take into account only the data items at the current timestamp and ignore the rest of the time series (event-level) when there are no {\thethings}.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Whereas, when each timestamp corresponds to a {\thething} we consider and protect all the events throughout the entire series (user-level).
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\subsubsection{Privacy parameters}
 | 
					\subsubsection{Privacy parameters}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user