evaluation: Moved some general info to details
This commit is contained in:
parent
19361eaa37
commit
8b2622781c
@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ In order to get {\thethings} with the above distribution features, we generate p
|
|||||||
For example, for a left-skewed {\thethings} distribution we would utilize a truncated distribution resulting from the restriction of the domain of a distribution to the beginning and end of the time series with its location shifted to the center of the right half of the series.
|
For example, for a left-skewed {\thethings} distribution we would utilize a truncated distribution resulting from the restriction of the domain of a distribution to the beginning and end of the time series with its location shifted to the center of the right half of the series.
|
||||||
For consistency, we calculate the scale parameter depending on the length of the series by setting it equal to the series' length over a constant.
|
For consistency, we calculate the scale parameter depending on the length of the series by setting it equal to the series' length over a constant.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Notice that in our experiments, in the cases when we have $0\%$ and $100\%$ of the events being {\thethings}, we get the same behavior as in event- and user-level privacy respectively.
|
||||||
|
This happens due the fact that at each timestamp we take into account only the data items at the current timestamp and ignore the rest of the time series (event-level) when there are no {\thethings}.
|
||||||
|
Whereas, when each timestamp corresponds to a {\thething} we consider and protect all the events throughout the entire series (user-level).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Privacy parameters}
|
\subsubsection{Privacy parameters}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user