From 5dda0700fb43e3545c48904f0b3652cf1164b093 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manos Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:18:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] text: Minor corrections --- text/problem/summary.tex | 2 +- text/problem/thething/main.tex | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/text/problem/summary.tex b/text/problem/summary.tex index a44f282..5c83625 100644 --- a/text/problem/summary.tex +++ b/text/problem/summary.tex @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ In this chapter, we presented \emph{{\thething} privacy} for privacy-preserving time series publishing, which allows for the protection of significant events, while improving the utility of the final result with respect to the traditional user-level differential privacy. We also proposed three models for {\thething} privacy, and quantified the privacy loss under temporal correlation. -Furthermore, we present three solutions to enhance our privacy scheme by protecting the actual temporal position of the{\thethings} in the time series. +Furthermore, we present three solutions to enhance our privacy scheme by protecting the actual temporal position of the {\thethings} in the time series. We differ the experimental evaluation of our methodology to Chapter~\ref{ch:eval} we experiment with real and synthetic data sets to demonstrate the applicability of the {\thething} privacy models by themselves (Section~\ref{sec:eval-lmdk-sel}) and in combination with the {\thething} selection component (Section~\ref{sec:eval-lmdk}). %Our experiments on real and synthetic data sets validate our proposal. diff --git a/text/problem/thething/main.tex b/text/problem/thething/main.tex index fe60e98..1573a54 100644 --- a/text/problem/thething/main.tex +++ b/text/problem/thething/main.tex @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ In reality, this is a simplistic\kat{I would not say simplistic, but unrealistic The fact that an event is significant, can be related to certain user-defined privacy criteria, or to its adjacent events, as well as to the entire time series. We term significant events as \emph{{\thething} events} or simply \emph{\thethings}, following relevant literature\kat{can you find some other work that uses the same term? otherwise one can raise the question why not ot use the word significant }. -Identifying {\thethings} in timeseries can be done in an automatic or manual way. +Identifying {\thethings} in time series can be done in an automatic or manual way. For example, in spatiotemporal data, \emph{places where an individual spent some time} denote \emph{points of interest} (POIs) (called also stay points)~\cite{zheng2015trajectory}. Such events, and more particularly their spatial attribute values, can be less privacy-sensitive~\cite{primault2018long}, e.g.,~parks, theaters, etc. or, if individuals frequent them, they can reveal supplementary information, e.g.,~residences (home addresses)~\cite{gambs2010show}, places of worship (religious beliefs)~\cite{franceschi-bicchierairussell2015redditor}, etc. POIs can be an example of how we can choose {\thethings}, but the idea is not limited to these.