conclusion: Intro
This commit is contained in:
parent
09970607ff
commit
119a15024a
@ -1,5 +1,18 @@
|
|||||||
\chapter{Conclusion and future work}
|
\chapter{Conclusion and future work}
|
||||||
\label{ch:con}
|
\label{ch:con}
|
||||||
|
Continuous publishing of data, also known as time series, has found over the past decades several application domains, including healthcare, smart building, and traffic monitoring.
|
||||||
|
In many cases, time series are geotagged data containing sensitive personal details, and thus their processing entails privacy concerns.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The processing/publishing of time series that contain user-generated data, may not only pose privacy risks to the individuals involved but also deteriorate arbitrarily the data utility.
|
||||||
|
To this end, differential privacy is the most prominent privacy method that can efficiently balance between user protection and data utility.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this thesis, we have concentrated on continuous user-generated data publishing.
|
||||||
|
We have studied the relevant literature with special emphasis on data correlation.
|
||||||
|
Furthermore, we explored ways to provide configurable protection in such settings and developed relevant solutions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Next, we summarize this thesis in the individual chapters by describing our contribution to the problems surrounding quality and privacy in user-generated Big Data.
|
||||||
|
Subsequently, we discuss interesting perspectives and open questions for future investigation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\input{conclusion/summary}
|
\input{conclusion/summary}
|
||||||
\input{conclusion/perspectives}
|
\input{conclusion/perspectives}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user